Automotive & Electric Vehicles (EV) Automotive & Electric Vehicles (EV)

Advanced Thermal Conductivity Testing Capabilities for Optimizing EV Thermal Management.  Accelerate your time to market.

Problems surrounding thermal management are amongst one of the largest challenge areas facing electric vehicles (EVs).  EV manufacturers don’t have a lot of time to address the challenge. Poor thermal management can result in weaker product performance, reduced lifecycle and, in a worst-case, thermal runaway events in which serious damage to the product and/or user can occur. To avoid such issues, it is crucial to have a proper understanding of the thermal conductivity of the materials used in the construction, particularly those of the battery. It is important to do this fast as the industry is undergoing significant disruption with engineering teams feeling significant pressure to shorten the time-to-market while hitting the quality performance needed to remain competitive.

C-Therm’s Trident Thermal Conductivity Instrument provides advanced capabilities for providing critical insight on the heat dissipation qualities of components and materials.

Trident Thermal Conductivity Instrument with MTPS, TPS, and TLS sensors.

Trident Thermal Conductivity Instrument with MTPS, TPS, and TLS sensors.


Accurate data is crucial for material selection and computational thermal modelling (FEA / CFD) purposes. Some examples of where thermal conductivity is considered a critical performance attribute in the overall thermal management of electric vehicles include:

  • battery pack and enclosure
  • EV coolants
  • phase change materials (PCM) for battery cooling
  • electric motor potting compound and other thermal interface materials (TIMs)
  • axial cooling channel within a motor stator
  • 3D printed parts (metal and plastic)
  • Thermoelectric generators for energy harvesting


It is important to understand that many traditional methods for thermal conductivity are inadequate for a number of the above materials.  The composites materials developed for such applications are often anisotropic and have a heat dissipation that is an order of magnitude different in the axial and radial orientation.  The composites are often filled materials with additives such as boron nitride and other conductive fillers added to the polymer matrix.  Understanding the distribution of such fillers is important in understanding overall performance.  These materials are not typically homogeneous and methods that assume homogeneity significantly distort the true thermal conductivity performance. Testing liquids requires careful consideration of the impact of convection as an error source.  In optimizing thermal management of electric vehicles, what is required is a platform that can accommodate these different scenarios and provide the ability to test the thermal conductivity of solids (isotropic, anisotropic or orthotropic), liquids and thin films. 


Trident offers the most advanced capabilities in measuring and testing the thermal conductivity performance of EV materials and components. Trident brings together the three most powerful transient methods for thermal conductivity. Transient methods provide faster test time and greater sample versatility.  Contact C-Therm to learn more how the organization is helping EV engineers and researchers accelerate their time to market.  Contact us.



Measuring the Thermal Conductivity of Automotive Components

Today’s automotive industry incorporates a wide range of materials into the construction of its vehicles. From composite interior paneling to the rubber in the tires and everything in between, modern vehicle manufacturing incorporates an extensive range of components in even the simplest models. While there are an ample number of material performance properties to consider, thermal conductivity (k) and related thermal properties such as effusivity are of great importance to almost all areas in question. 

High thermally conductive materials are critical for parts such as brake pads and engine components that must dissipate heat. Newer hybrid and electric vehicles incorporate components that have very low thermal conductivities by design to aid in energy conversion efficiency. Automotive composites will often have anisotropic or orientation-dependent heat transfer properties.  It is important to be able to characterize the effective heat transfer in distinguishing between the through-plane and in-plane orientations.  With so many mechanical, structural and electrical components working in synergy, proper knowledge of the thermal heat characteristics of a multitude of components is crucial to the overall performance and quality of the build.

  • Optimized Thermal Conductivity for EVs

    Optimized Thermal Conductivity for EVs

  • How important is thermal conductivity in the performance of EVs?  Researchers have demonstrated that a small change in the thermal conductivity of the electric motor potting compound result in a    large    change    in    peak    motor    temperature.   For candidate potting materials below 4 W/mK, percent change in peak motor temperature ranges from about 33% to 20% per 1 W/mK change of thermal conductivity.

    How important is thermal conductivity in the performance of EVs? Researchers have demonstrated that a small change in the thermal conductivity of the electric motor potting compound result in a large change in peak motor temperature. For candidate potting materials below 4 W/mK, percent change in peak motor temperature ranges from about 33% to 20% per 1 W/mK change of thermal conductivity.

  • C-Therm’s thermal conductivity instrumentation is helping EV battery pack designers and OEMs optimize heat dissipation in improving the safety, robustness and performance of EVs.

    C-Therm’s thermal conductivity instrumentation is helping EV battery pack designers and OEMs optimize heat dissipation in improving the safety, robustness and performance of EVs.

  • Thermal Conductivity Management of EVs

    Thermal Conductivity Management of EVs

  • Thermally Anisotropic Polymer Composites

    Thermally Anisotropic Polymer Composites

Measuring the Thermal Effusivity of Automotive Interiors

Getting from A to B is no longer the measure of a quality vehicle. From entry-level models to the more luxurious, the aesthetics and interior layout have a huge impact on buyer perception. Materials used for the interior must not only look sleek, but also leave the customer comfortable and feeling as though the car is well-crafted.  Increasingly composites are incorporated into the automotive interior.  They offer the benefit of greater durability, less weight and greater production efficiency.  However, consumers generally prefer the look of natural materials such as leather (seating) and wood (paneling).  When consumers touch composites that are made to look convincingly like these natural materials and yet they feel like plastic – disappointment or questions of quality can negatively impact the purchase decision.  This feeling of touch is quantifiably measured in characterizing the thermal effusivity of the material with C-Therm’s unique ability to measure the property directly. 

Another example most can relate to is the use of synthetic leather upholstery vs fabric. While leather options tend to represent a superior class of vehicle, in hot climates the touch sensation of hot leather can be very disagreeable, and a fabric alternative may be the better option.

Thermal Conductivity

Rapid Thermal Conductivity Testing with Trident

C-Therm’s range of thermal conductivity and effusivity characterization equipment has a solution ready for your testing needs. The flexible, versatile and accurate Trident Thermal Property Analyzer is an ideal choice for the analysis of any number of materials used in all vehicle types on the road today as highlighted in the case highlights below.

  • Haydale Composites Solutions Ltd.

    C-Therm MTPS has been a key piece of testing equipment at Haydale, providing fast and accurate thermal conductivity measurements for our product development of nanocomposites. Having this capability has allowed a better understanding of the dispersion of nanomaterials in polymer matrices through thermal mapping sample surfaces. The support and customer service from C-Therm has been excellent over the years, we look forward to dealing with them again in the near future.”

    Stuart Sykes

    Haydale Composites Solutions Ltd. More Testimonials
  • Classic Oil

    Our lab is specialized on heat transfer and antifreeze fluids R&D and analysis. C-Therm thermal conductivity detector we have been using almost three years, during which we have performed more than 900 measurements with dozens of values in each measurement. Detector represents simple and quick laboratory technique and provides satisfactory stable values in short time. In research we value C-Therm as a device enabling deeper understanding of the matter through easy instrumental technique, without troublesome samples pretreatment."

    Ing. Marie Kačírková, Ph.D.,
    Product Development Specialist

    Classic Oil More Testimonials
  • Covestro

    The C-Therm Thermal Conductivity Analyzer has provided our group a fast, accurate capability to test the thermal conductivity of our polymers with C-Therm’s patented high-precision MTPS sensor. The instrument has become very popular within our group for its quick easy reliable measurement and the support from C-Therm has exceeded our expectations. We recently upgraded the unit with the new robust TLS module for work on polymer melts."

    Jose Fonseca,
    Expert in Thermodynamics

    Covestro More Testimonials

Case Highlights

Testing Battery Thermal Management Systems (Phase Change Materials and Active Cooling)

Lithium ion batteries for commercial use pose barriers due to safety, cost related to cycle life, low-temperature performance, and thermal effects in the battery (overcharging can result in explosion).  Better battery thermal management systems (BTMS) are being explored, with both active cooling (fans and liquid) and passive cooling (Phase Change Materials (PCMs)).  Thermal conductivity enhancement of these PCMs with carbon based nanoparticles was investigated.


Investigating the thermal conductivity enhancement of PCMs for batteries was performed with a Modified Transient Plane Source sensor from C-Therm.  Testing was done before and after phase change (in solid and liquid state) of pure wax, 5% loaded and 10% loaded samples.

Thermal conductivity of PCM samples as a function of mass fraction of nanoparticles and temperature

Results and Conclusion

Significant increases in thermal conductivity were observed, going from 0.25 W/mK to as high as 2.75 W/mK.  Using 2mm layer of 5% and 10% weight loading, the PCM can maintain battery temperature 1.2 and 1.9℃ lower, compared to pure paraffin.

Temperature distribution in the module with 3 mm thick pure wax (left) and 1 mm wt% NePCM (right) at the end of driving cycle


This experiment was carried out using C-Therm’s Modified Transient Plane Source sensor.

Thermal Conductivity of Brake Pads: Semi-Metallic vs Ceramic

The undeniable importance of braking power to the safe operation of an automobile has led to on-going research into the optimal properties of materials for modern braking systems. This note shows how the C-Therm Trident Thermal Conductivity Analyzer system is employed to effectively measure the thermal conductivity (k) of a wide range of sample types using its multi-sensor options.

In its simplest form, brakes work by first converting the kinetic energy of your vehicles motion to heat and then dissipating that heat to the atmosphere. The major component of importance in modern braking systems are the brake pads. Brake pads were traditionally made from pure metals due to their high thermal conductivities resulting in their uncanny ability to resist thermal stress and dissipate generated heat. Unfortunately, metal-based components can carry a significant weight and in-turn lower overall efficiency. Today, most brake pads have since been replaced by semi-metallic, ceramic or organic based composites to overcome the drawbacks of pure metals. A brief overview of the various brake pad types can be seen in Table 1, below.

Table 1: Brake Pad Types and Considerations

Type Consideration

– Very duarble

– Excellent thermal properties

– Tend to be noisy

– Can under-perform at low temperatures

Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO)

– Softer and create less noise than Semi-Metallic

– Not as durable

– Create significantly more dust

Low-Metallic NAO

– Less noisy than Semi-Metallic

– Great thermal properties

– More durable than NAO


– Typically most expensive

– Extremely durable

– Great thermal properties

– Low noise

– Low dust

While there are many considerations to take into account (see above), ultimately stopping power can be most strongly related to thermal conductivity. To illustrate it’s ability to accurately and precisely test various brake pad materials, a C-Therm Trident Thermal Conductivity Analyzer was utilized with the Transient Plane Source  (TPS)  configuration operating in accordance to ISO 22007-2 to compare semi-metallic to ceramic brake pads (see Figure 1 & 2). Both sets of pads are base level units (<100$), however it should be noted the ceramic pads were ~20% more expensive. For testing of these samples the reported results are the average of five tests.

Figure 1: Semi-Metallic Brake Pad

Figure 2: Ceramic Brake Pad

Figure 3: Thermal Conductivity of Semi-Metallic and Ceramic Brake Pads

As can be seen from figure 3 above, the semi-metallic pads resulted in thermal conductivity of 4.36 W/mK, whereas the ceramic pads were only about 2.79 W/mK (44% difference). Trident’s TPS configuration was the optimal way to test these brake pads due to the hard and rigid nature of the samples. While not reported herein, it should be noted that C-Therm’s TPS module also simultaneously collects and displays diffusivity data for applications where both are required. All testing had a precision of better then 1.7%. The above results clearly demonstrate the superior thermal properties of semi-metallics over ceramics as well as coming in at a lower price point. Ultimately the higher thermal conductivity will result in an improved stopping performance as it can better dissipate the generate heat and lower the net thermal stress on the braking system.


Energy Education: Braking

Ceramic Vs Metallic Brake Pads

Related Resources:

Testing Brake Pads

The Influence of Brake Pads Thermal Conductivity on Passenger Car Brake System Efficiency


About the Author: Arya Hakimian is an Applications Specialist at C-Therm, he has a MSc in Chemistry from the University of New Brunswick. Arya is dedicated to the improvement of thermal conductivity research across a wide range of industries.

Thermal Effusivity Analysis of Composite Paneling for Automotive Interiors

With much of the focus on the structural and mechanical aspects in automotive manufacturing, one can’t forget the measure of a quality vehicle also encompasses the individual’s comfortability. Simple aspects such as the “touch” sensation of the interior fabrics or panelling can all add or takeaway from the customers experience. This note shows how the C-Therm Trident system can be used to not only obtain important thermal conductivity (k), but also simultaneously obtain thermal effusivity data in the range of 5 to 40,000 Ws1/2/m2K using the Modified Transient Plane Source (MTPS)  sensor.

Thermal effusivity plays a huge role in an individual’s perception of touch sensation and is most commonly associated with textiles (see Figure 1). While textiles have massive applications in the fashion and apparel sector, automotive interiors are also very demanding with regards to textile R&D. Aspects such as upholstery fabric, interior panelling and more are all textile heavy areas with the need for robust and precise testing of thermal effusivity properties. The ability to compare the quality perception of synthetic vs. natural materials is also of great importance to product development and is yet another area where C-Therm’s line of Thermal Analyzers can provide fast and precise testing results on a wide range of material types.

Figure 1: Honeycomb Paneling

The following is a study of various automotive companies’ overhead paneling which help to not only insulate heat, but also sound. Tests were performed on both the front (interior) and back (exterior) side using C-Therm’s Thermal Analyzer in MTPS configuration. For the testing of these samples, the panel layers consisted of at minimum an interior facing fabric, board or foam core and a backing material facing the exterior. The reported test values are the average of 3 tests per side. The effusivity test results can be seen below in Figure 2.

Figure 2: MTPS Thermal Effusivity Analysis of Automotive Composite Paneling

As can be seen from the figure above, in all cases the interior facing fabric was lower in thermal effusivity then the exterior facing backing material. This is a purposeful design as the lower thermal effusivity side, which is directly visible as the car interior, has a better ability to maintain the internal temperature. Conversely, the back-side material which has a larger thermal effusivity would be better at dissipating any external heat from the external environment. It should be noted that in this study the Hyundai panelling material resulted in the highest thermal effusivity for both the front and rear facing side.


Effusivity of Automotive Interior Overhead Panels


About the Author: Arya Hakimian is an Applications Specialist at C-Therm, he has a MSc in Chemistry from the University of New Brunswick. Arya is dedicated to the improvement of thermal conductivity research across a wide range of industries.

Effect of Various Loads of Carbon Nanotubes to Help Improve Rubber Composite Performance

Today’s tires aren’t made of pure rubber, but composite materials of elastomers, reinforcement fibers, plasticizers and much more which help improve performance and extend lifetime. Composite manufacturing can be complex in nature due to issues such as non-homogenous dispersion of additives which can lead to weak points. It is therefore crucial to be able to not only measure, but “map” results of interest. This note will help demonstrate the importance of thermal conductivity (k) in composite tire manufacturing and how C-Therm’s Trident system can be used to obtain that critical information using the Modified Transient Plane Source (MTPS)  sensor conforming to ASTM D7984. This proprietary, single-sided sensor is ideal for fast paced QA/QC and R&D environments with test times ranging from 0.8 to 3 seconds.

The frictional resistance between your tires and the road determine exactly how fast you can accelerate, take turns and most importantly how fast you can stop. On a very basic level, friction can be thought to come from the “surface roughness” between the two objects that are pressed in contact.  The frictional force is also proportional to the coefficient of friction (µ). As is with everything involving friction, generated heat plays a major role in overall performance. It is therefore vital to ensure a strong understanding of thermal conductivity characteristics.  For a closer look at the physics behind car tires and friction here is a detailed video from Michel Van Biezan, University of Los Angels.

C Therm’s MTPS method was employed by P. Vizureanu et al., Faculty of Material Science and Engineering at the Technical University of Iaşi (2015), with the goal of investigating the properties of reinforced rubber composites with different carbon nanotube (CNT) concentrations. The single-sided MTPS module was an excellent fit for analysis of these sample types as both thermal conductivity and effusivity are measured directly providing a detailed overview of the thermal characteristics of the samples. Various CNT loadings from 5-30% were investigated on two different substrate thicknesses (10 and 20mm). Results from this study can be seen in Figure 1, below. Data represents the average result of 10 runs per sample.

Figure 1. MTPS Thermal Conductivity Analysis of Rubber Composite Samples

Figure 2. SEM Imaging of Rubber Composite at Different CNT Concentrations¹

P. Vizureanu et al. (2015) found that an increase to CNT concentration lead to an overall increase in thermal conductivity (see Figure 1). Most notably the 30% CNT loading had the largest thermal conductivity increase of ~26% for both the 10 and 20mm samples. Further analysis found that the effective increase was not only dependant on CNT concentration, but also the geometry and distribution of the additives. It was concluded that the large increase to thermal conductivity represented a success for all applications with thermal input. Although done qualitatively (see Figure 2), this paper is an excellent example of how the non-destructive MTPS method would allow for high precision (better then 1%) thermal mapping of the samples to gain quantitative insight into the overall distribution of the CNTs.


Investigation on Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites¹

Hyper Physics – Friction

Michelin – Products – Tires

Related resources:

Bridgestone – Tire Tread Wear Causes

Hutchinson Tires – Categories

Correlation of Tire Wear and Friction to Texture of Concrete Pavements

Thermal conductivity of natural rubber nanocomposites with hybrid fillers


About the Author: Arya Hakimian is an Applications Specialist at C-Therm, he has a MSc in Chemistry from the University of New Brunswick. Arya is dedicated to the improvement of thermal conductivity research across a wide range of industries.


Request a Quote